This would likely become yet another one of my "back of the drawer" projects,
A major inspiration comes from the awareness of the oppressive nature of organized religion and the even more serious issue of the lack of sufficient taxation on churches,
especially as churches can be easily exploited for the purposes of money laundering and that the attendees can be brainwashed with biggoted mindsets to close their minds with the
purpose of exploiting the fact there are attendees so as to claim the money came from doations and attendees.
One of the many reasons some churches feed racist ideologies to their peers is so to encourage the most narrow world view possible so
as to numb the attendees into routine which in turn makes for an easier to control populus for the purposes of covering up money laundering (Stares at Westborough Baptist Church, lol).
The use of racism and general bigotry is used so as to prevent attendees from talking to a wider audience as doing so would risk "breaking the spell" so to speak and would turn
the attendees against said church (and in often cases when this happens, would turn the ex-attendee against all churches and/or all religious ideologies)
Todo (notes, contexts, etc):
this will be an educational awareness piece about the methods that are possible for laundering money through the use of churches
as a front and why churches need to be exempted from the protections of charity and instead slapped with a 75% taxation minimum
in any country for any priest, preacher, or uper hierachal person (above commoner congrational peer status) to deter the use of
churches for unfair enrichment and socially unjust exploitation of the local porper whilst in turn allowing the use of increased
taxation of churches to increase the tax-pool.
This allows the ppssiblity to decrease taxes in impovished areas with an aim to give better prospects to the currently diverse
people below the poverty line to have access to a beter life.
Taxing of churches at 75% and above would be a small drop in the tax pool, however the same can be said if one person stopped
paying tax but that's just one person out of millions following suit means no-one pays taxes in the hypothetical, thus by
dismissing the taxation of churches we allow ourselves excuses to not tax other things on the basis of "only a small drop", the
many "only a small drop" events build up to a huge drop in the tax pool.
The point about taxing churches and the measurement on what should be considered a "only a small drop" is to measure those
simulteously against the measuring stick of fairness and social justice.
So to increase every poor person's tax to 75% would massively increase the tax pool, it is however then going to widen the poverty
gap creating tensions and causing toxic forms of competativeness, i.e. resource scarcity that could lead to racial tribalism.
This clearly wouldn't pass the fairness test whereas churches having far less use of the money and hence why those running churches
are able to pay themselves so much.
Churches however should get some tax rebate for food and helping impovished so as long as without a shadow of a doubt the money can
be proven to have gone on these causes. The taxation should be targetted at taxing church-sourced income, that is, the wages of
those running churches should be taxed at the rate of 75% on all income sourced from church and religious institutions (points
finger towards scientology and similar cults) with the church being by default taxed at 75% on all collections before rebates
(which if a church was genuinly helping instead of laundering money legally, in theory could end up with the equivalent of a final
tax payment as though they were taxed at 20% from the start).
The outcome would be the closing of many churches due to the viability of laundering money reaches zero and thus worthless, this
would help many congregational attendees to realise they've been tricked into beleif for the purposes of enriching the few. They
begin to see the truth behind the existence of organized religion in the modern and metamodern world
(ignoring competing anti-modernists aka post-postmodernists).
The purpose is to break down and deconstruct organized religion at all levels of society and if proven successful in the context of
churches, can then be applied to all other forms of organized religion.
After all, stripping back churches and subsequentially other religious institutions by removing such a huge exploitation of religious
privalege would leave only the most true, honest and dedicated beleivers who would happily set up a shed in a garden for use as a
church.... Alongside the desired outcomes that lead to more equal and fairer treatment of people in general (by a larger pool of tax
to decrease burdens on poorer people and by the reduction of churches known to enforce biggotry for the purposes of preventing their
attendees questioning, which the prevention of questioning leads to the prevention of those people from learning new things (note
how most evangelized church attendees are unable to fix many simple faults with their car or home and instead go to the dealer, a
builder or other sources, but those who run those churches are often tech savvy???)
some points above to be expanded on,
add at least one movie ref to churches-as-money-laundering (can't remember the names of most of the movies that featured the trope,
this is more a meme-reference to how common place church-laundering is that it ends up as scenes in movies.).
find examples of real world incidents (Kent Hov' guy and his many dealings with the law ref his "themepark", Kenith Copeland's shenanigans, etc)
Kennith Copeland and his tax avoidance.... where does so much money come from and why he makes false justifications in regards to spendature?
person beats me to it in video form but from the other version of this story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf8zqj66YxA
An example of a person who used church to cover laundering and human trafficking: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83L7jgDDzsM